Discussion:
Rudd's wife scandal
(too old to reply)
Princeandy
2007-05-24 22:23:09 UTC
Permalink
I can just imagine what the opposition and its cronies would be saying
if this debacle was centred around a Liberal member or any of their
family, or for that matter any non Labor citizen.
SO BAD LAW MAKES EVEN THE BEST INTENTIONED SOMETIMES TRANGRESS THEIR OWN
DECENCY.
The unions would be saying "This is just enother example of how
unscrupulous employers are using these unfair laws to erode wages and
conditions of decent Australians"
OF COURSE, AND SEEING THAT IS THE WHOLE INTENTION OF THOSE LAWS WHAT EXACTLY
IS YOUR BITCH?
Julia Gillard would say "The things depicted are totally accurate
under the current laws" (as she said about the laughable AWA skit on
McLeod's daughters.)
There would mysteriously be no mention of it being a "mistake"
HOW CAN IT BE A MISTAKE FOR LIBERALS WHEN THESE LAWS WERE PROMULGATED BY
LIBERALS , ARE SOLIDLY SUPPORTED BY LIBERALS, AND ARE CONTINUALLY USING
PUBLIC FUNDS TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THAT THIS IS THE BEST DEAL THEY HAVE EVER
HAD FROM A GOVERNMENT??
THAT THIS IS THE WAY TO GO AND ALL BATTLING PAYE VOTERS SHOULD VOTE THEM IN
SO THE CAN HELP THE BATTLERS EVEN MORE BY RE-INFORCING AND EXTENDING THOSE
LAWS.


and
certainly know acknowledgement that the activities are ILLEGAL under
the workplace laws. It would be made out to be (as everything is)
completely above-board and just what we could expect.
YES THIS IS GOING ON AS WE SPEAK UNDER LIBERAL EMPLOYERS. WHAT DONT YOU
UNDERSTAND ABOUT THAT.
The ALP would seize on such an example to paint it as a perfectly
lawful way the evil workplace reforms were screwing over the
Australian worker.
NO THERE ARE TO MANY, AND READ THE COMPLIANCE LAWS THAT FORBID ANY PERSON
OFFERING ADVICE THAT IS AT ALL USEFUL OR HELPFUL TO A PERSON IN THAT
SITUATION.

WITH PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO MANAGERS AND OWNERS NOT INFORMING EMPLOYEES OF
UNION HELP AVAILABLE??
I think the only way Labor or the unions would ever admit that the
business had "made a mistake" rather than "deliberately screwing over
employees" is in a situation like this when one of their own did the
deed.
NO LIBERALS DO NOT MAKE A MISTAKE SEEING THEY HAVE HAD THEIR
REPRESENTATIVES.ie THE LIBERAL PARTY MAKE THIS ALL POSSIBLE BY PUSHING LAWS
THAT MAKE SUCH ACTIONS POSSIBLE.
Perhaps some of the brainwashed lefties will now concede, that
teething problems happen and the "abuses" we hear about are illegal
under the workplace reforms.
PERHAPS THE BRAINWASHED LIBERALS WILL NOW REALISE THE INJUSTICE OF THOSE
LAWS AND HOW MUCH IT IS POSSIBLE TO LOSE WITHOIUT THE EMPLOYER EVEN TRYING.
JUST ADOPTING THE PRAXTICES POSSIBLE UNDER THESE LAWS.
Funny how it took an embarrassing family scandal to get Rudd to admit
it.
AS HE POINTED OUT HE WAS UNAWARE, HOWEVER AS SOON AS IT CAME TO HIS
ATTENTION HE FIXED IT TO ALIGN WITH HIS LIBERAL VIEWS.

WHICH OF COURSE IS NOT BEING DONE BY THE THOUSANDS OF LIBERAL ORIENTATED
EMPLOYERS
WHO ARE USING THESE LAWS TO DOWNGRADE CONDITIONS AND WAGES OF THEIR
EMPLOYEES.

AND DONT GIVE US THE LEFT CRAP, YOU DONT REPRESENT THE RIGHT, JUST THE
EXTREME RIGHT LIKE THE PRESENT DAY LIBERAL PARTY, AND WHY A LOT OF DECENT
RIGHT WILL BE VOTING AGAINST THE REPRESSIVE AND UNFAIR VIEWS OF THE PRESENT
LIBERAL PARTY AS PUT FORWARD BY YOU HERE.
Princeandy
2007-05-25 09:57:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Princeandy
I can just imagine what the opposition and its cronies would be saying
if this debacle was centred around a Liberal member or any of their
family, or for that matter any non Labor citizen.
SO BAD LAW MAKES EVEN THE BEST INTENTIONED SOMETIMES TRANGRESS THEIR OWN
DECENCY.
The unions would be saying "This is just enother example of how
unscrupulous employers are using these unfair laws to erode wages and
conditions of decent Australians"
OF COURSE, AND SEEING THAT IS THE WHOLE INTENTION OF THOSE LAWS WHAT
EXACTLY
Post by Princeandy
IS YOUR BITCH?
Julia Gillard would say "The things depicted are totally accurate
under the current laws" (as she said about the laughable AWA skit on
McLeod's daughters.)
There would mysteriously be no mention of it being a "mistake"
HOW CAN IT BE A MISTAKE FOR LIBERALS WHEN THESE LAWS WERE PROMULGATED BY
LIBERALS , ARE SOLIDLY SUPPORTED BY LIBERALS, AND ARE CONTINUALLY USING
PUBLIC FUNDS TO LET EVERYONE KNOW THAT THIS IS THE BEST DEAL THEY HAVE
EVER
Post by Princeandy
HAD FROM A GOVERNMENT??
THAT THIS IS THE WAY TO GO AND ALL BATTLING PAYE VOTERS SHOULD VOTE THEM
IN
Post by Princeandy
SO THE CAN HELP THE BATTLERS EVEN MORE BY RE-INFORCING AND EXTENDING
THOSE
Post by Princeandy
LAWS.
and
certainly know acknowledgement that the activities are ILLEGAL under
the workplace laws. It would be made out to be (as everything is)
completely above-board and just what we could expect.
YES THIS IS GOING ON AS WE SPEAK UNDER LIBERAL EMPLOYERS. WHAT DONT YOU
UNDERSTAND ABOUT THAT.
The ALP would seize on such an example to paint it as a perfectly
lawful way the evil workplace reforms were screwing over the
Australian worker.
NO THERE ARE TO MANY, AND READ THE COMPLIANCE LAWS THAT FORBID ANY
PERSON
Post by Princeandy
OFFERING ADVICE THAT IS AT ALL USEFUL OR HELPFUL TO A PERSON IN THAT
SITUATION.
WITH PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO MANAGERS AND OWNERS NOT INFORMING EMPLOYEES
OF
Post by Princeandy
UNION HELP AVAILABLE??
I think the only way Labor or the unions would ever admit that the
business had "made a mistake" rather than "deliberately screwing over
employees" is in a situation like this when one of their own did the
deed.
NO LIBERALS DO NOT MAKE A MISTAKE SEEING THEY HAVE HAD THEIR
REPRESENTATIVES.ie THE LIBERAL PARTY MAKE THIS ALL POSSIBLE BY PUSHING
LAWS
Post by Princeandy
THAT MAKE SUCH ACTIONS POSSIBLE.
Perhaps some of the brainwashed lefties will now concede, that
teething problems happen and the "abuses" we hear about are illegal
under the workplace reforms.
PERHAPS THE BRAINWASHED LIBERALS WILL NOW REALISE THE INJUSTICE OF THOSE
LAWS AND HOW MUCH IT IS POSSIBLE TO LOSE WITHOIUT THE EMPLOYER EVEN
TRYING.
Post by Princeandy
JUST ADOPTING THE PRAXTICES POSSIBLE UNDER THESE LAWS.
Funny how it took an embarrassing family scandal to get Rudd to admit
it.
AS HE POINTED OUT HE WAS UNAWARE, HOWEVER AS SOON AS IT CAME TO HIS
ATTENTION HE FIXED IT TO ALIGN WITH HIS LIBERAL VIEWS.
WHICH OF COURSE IS NOT BEING DONE BY THE THOUSANDS OF LIBERAL ORIENTATED
EMPLOYERS
WHO ARE USING THESE LAWS TO DOWNGRADE CONDITIONS AND WAGES OF THEIR
EMPLOYEES.
AND DONT GIVE US THE LEFT CRAP, YOU DONT REPRESENT THE RIGHT, JUST THE
EXTREME RIGHT LIKE THE PRESENT DAY LIBERAL PARTY, AND WHY A LOT OF
DECENT
Post by Princeandy
RIGHT WILL BE VOTING AGAINST THE REPRESSIVE AND UNFAIR VIEWS OF THE
PRESENT
Post by Princeandy
LIBERAL PARTY AS PUT FORWARD BY YOU HERE.
He, he, he, if Rudd's wife can't comply with the awards, what does
that say about awards to begin with.
Rudd's wife has done nothing wrong or immoral, the award system is
outdated and Employers should have flexibility to pay their employers
as they see fit and let market forces determine what a persons skills
and labor are worth, not a union created award.
WHAT CRAP, FOR THE SAME REASONS THAT UNIONS WERE ORIGINALLY FORMED, IT COSTS
THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS AND DAMN GOOD LAWTERS FOR ANY WORKER TO OBTAIN A FAIR
RATE SET ON PERSONAL SKILLS.

AND SKILLS AND LABOR DONT COUNT FOR MUCH IF YOU DONT HAVE THE BARGAINING
POWER OR LEGAL KNOWHOW TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOUR WORTH.

FOR EXAMPLE WHAT RATE WOULD YOU CONSIDER FAIR FOR AN ABLE WORKER?

1/600TH OF THE CEO'S, THE DIFFERENCE THESE DAYS?
Kwyjibo
2007-05-25 10:24:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Princeandy
IT COSTS
THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS AND DAMN GOOD LAWTERS FOR ANY WORKER TO OBTAIN A FAIR
RATE SET ON PERSONAL SKILLS.
Utter bullshit.
<rest of your pig ignorant shit snipped>

Fix your caps-lock, fuckwit.
--
Kwyj.
Princeandy
2007-05-28 13:22:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kwyjibo
Post by Princeandy
IT COSTS
THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS AND DAMN GOOD LAWTERS FOR ANY WORKER TO OBTAIN A FAIR
RATE SET ON PERSONAL SKILLS.
Utter bullshit.
<rest of your pig ignorant shit snipped>
Fix your caps-lock, fuckwit.
--
Kwyj.
GET A BRAIN IDIOT.
ONLY USE CAPS FOR THE OBVIOUSLY INTELLECTUALLY CHLLENGED. SO BACK TO THE
DISCUSSION, YO OBVIOUSLY WONT BE ABLE TO FOLLOW.


What this dickhead is trying to sell is the liberal lie of this all new and
better. And that pub he's raving in about might have well worked hard to
acheive what they have. But iunfortunately nobody wants to share sucess with
the workers, so if you can pay thm less under any scheme, you increase
profit while moaning about how much they care like johnny does while johnny
and they screw you.

simply not so easy if you have a union to fall back on.

LIKE THE POOR YANKS IN THE RICHEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD LOOK AT THEIR
SITUATION BELOW.

http://www.ywca.org/site/pp.asp?c=djISI6PIKpG&b=1716531
No one who works for a living should have to live in poverty."
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/01-09
-2007/0004502563&EDATE=

Since the last increase in 1997, the minimum wage has been stagnant at
a mere $5.15 an hour-$10,712 a year leaving a family of three approximately
$6,000 below the federal poverty line.
"Over the last several years, our agencies have been coping with steady
double digit increases each year in requests for emergency assistance
because low-wage workers simply cannot earn enough to cover rent, child
care, food, utilities, and clothing for their families," said Rev. Larry
Snyder, president of Catholic Charities USA. "Many people served by
Catholic Charities agencies are poor despite full-time employment at the
bottom of the labor market: cleaning houses and office buildings,
harvesting and preparing food, and watching over children of working
parents.
Kwyjibo
2007-05-29 05:35:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Princeandy
Post by Kwyjibo
Post by Princeandy
IT COSTS
THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS AND DAMN GOOD LAWTERS FOR ANY WORKER TO OBTAIN A
FAIR
Post by Kwyjibo
Post by Princeandy
RATE SET ON PERSONAL SKILLS.
Utter bullshit.
<rest of your pig ignorant shit snipped>
Fix your caps-lock, fuckwit.
--
Kwyj.
GET A BRAIN IDIOT.
Fix your caps-lock, fuckwit.
--
Kwyj.
marika
2007-06-06 05:46:10 UTC
Permalink
Princeandy wrote in message ...
Post by Princeandy
GET A BRAIN IDIOT.
There are really a couple people who play that guy, i think, it's probably
not just one person's account. Some of them already have brains.
the one that I used to enjoy the most -- he doesn't often post these days.
However, if you want to speak to "him", post something. He is
always there, as one of the collateral characters. The fun is to figure
which one he is that moment.
Post by Princeandy
ONLY USE CAPS FOR THE OBVIOUSLY INTELLECTUALLY CHLLENGED.
Why do you think
you are always able to explain these posts. probably Cos you are one of the
people who play him

When you choose a subject to post on, even if it is a one liner, check for
some posts. One of the characters may welcome you . That is not you.
Post by Princeandy
SO BACK TO THE
DISCUSSION, YO OBVIOUSLY WONT BE ABLE TO FOLLOW.
I know I didn't follow it. But You will probably find one guy somehow very
subtly, surreally and
obliquely making a reference to your post. That post will be astonishingly
zany. But you have to find it, and understand it
Post by Princeandy
What this dickhead is trying to sell is the liberal lie of this all new and
better.
"He" might post something more about liberal lies for you

That is you.
Post by Princeandy
And that pub he's raving in about might have well worked hard to
acheive what they have.
in fact, after i write this post, do see whether or not you see a post
meant just for you. I bet there is one.
they are all good and nothing wrong with having a few different accounts.
Post by Princeandy
But iunfortunately nobody wants to share sucess with
the workers, so if you can pay thm less under any scheme, you increase
profit while moaning about how much they care like johnny does while johnny
and they screw you.
the scheme of the game show loonies

just remember, no matter what name you choose, somehow they will know it is
you.
Post by Princeandy
simply not so easy if you have a union to fall back on.
they have a great deal in common
Post by Princeandy
LIKE THE POOR YANKS IN THE RICHEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD LOOK AT THEIR
SITUATION BELOW.
there is one I associate with this and so on
Post by Princeandy
http://www.ywca.org/site/pp.asp?c=djISI6PIKpG&b=1716531
No one who works for a living should have to live in poverty."
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/01-0
9
Post by Princeandy
-2007/0004502563&EDATE=
Since the last increase in 1997, the minimum wage has been stagnant at
a mere $5.15 an hour-$10,712 a year leaving a family of three approximately
$6,000 below the federal poverty line.
"Over the last several years, our agencies have been coping with steady
double digit increases each year in requests for emergency assistance
because low-wage workers simply cannot earn enough to cover rent, child
care, food, utilities, and clothing for their families," said Rev. Larry
Snyder, president of Catholic Charities USA.
best I can figure out, Larry is a MD
from Idaho, he seems rather nice and he might actually be a real person
Post by Princeandy
"Many people served by
Catholic Charities agencies are poor despite full-time employment at the
bottom of the labor market: cleaning houses and office buildings,
harvesting and preparing food, and watching over children of working
parents.
There have always been more than one person served by Catholic charities.
(not a misspelling)

mk5000


-----Original Message-----
From: marika <***@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: aus.sport.sailing,alt.usenet.legends.lester-mosley
Date: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: the worst thing you will ever see.
Post by Princeandy
jg wrote in message ...
Like old cars you sometimes wish they could just be beamed up.
YIKES.... now that'd piss off teh Catholics! It's ALL OVER for them.
mk5000
"Eight implants were placed in the thigh muscles of the left hind leg, four
In
the vastus lateralis and four in the rectus fernoria. Two methods of
approach
A long curving incision was made through the skin only, starting in the
region
of the trochanter major and curving anteriorly and distally to below
the stifle joint."--dow corning
GovShill
2007-05-25 12:27:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Princeandy
WHAT CRAP, FOR THE SAME REASONS THAT UNIONS WERE ORIGINALLY FORMED, IT COSTS
THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS AND DAMN GOOD LAWTERS FOR ANY WORKER TO OBTAIN A FAIR
RATE SET ON PERSONAL SKILLS.
Crap. My contract was negotiated by ME.
Post by Princeandy
AND SKILLS AND LABOR DONT COUNT FOR MUCH IF YOU DONT HAVE THE BARGAINING
POWER OR LEGAL KNOWHOW TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOUR WORTH.
Bullshit! My boss needs my skills. He can't get them anywhere else. He
pays what I want. He increases it when appropriate to keep me working
for him, because it would cost too much too replace me.
Post by Princeandy
FOR EXAMPLE WHAT RATE WOULD YOU CONSIDER FAIR FOR AN ABLE WORKER?
Well, I'm on almost twice as much money/annum on the contract I signed
2 years ago than the unionised job I had before that. And I can work
the hours that I want, take leave when I want, get recompensed for
working hours in excess of the 38 agreed hours/week. Pretty happy with
it actually. Unfair dismissal doesn't come into the equation. I do a
fair days work and get paid a fair days wages.

Shill #312
Princeandy
2007-05-28 13:45:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by GovShill
Post by Princeandy
WHAT CRAP, FOR THE SAME REASONS THAT UNIONS WERE ORIGINALLY FORMED, IT COSTS
THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS AND DAMN GOOD LAWTERS FOR ANY WORKER TO OBTAIN A FAIR
RATE SET ON PERSONAL SKILLS.
Crap. My contract was negotiated by ME.
Post by Princeandy
AND SKILLS AND LABOR DONT COUNT FOR MUCH IF YOU DONT HAVE THE BARGAINING
POWER OR LEGAL KNOWHOW TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOUR WORTH.
Bullshit! My boss needs my skills. He can't get them anywhere else. He
pays what I want. He increases it when appropriate to keep me working
for him, because it would cost too much too replace me.
Post by Princeandy
FOR EXAMPLE WHAT RATE WOULD YOU CONSIDER FAIR FOR AN ABLE WORKER?
Well, I'm on almost twice as much money/annum on the contract I signed
2 years ago than the unionised job I had before that. And I can work
the hours that I want, take leave when I want, get recompensed for
working hours in excess of the 38 agreed hours/week. Pretty happy with
it actually. Unfair dismissal doesn't come into the equation. I do a
fair days work and get paid a fair days wages.
WHAT ARE YOU, A BRAIN SURGEON??N OR THE CEO???
Post by GovShill
Shill #312
YOU SOUND LIKE THE PERFECT SUCKER KNOWITALL THAT WONT FIND OUT HOW THICK YOU
ARE TILL YOU'RE OLD ENOUGH TO WISH YOU'D HAD A BRAIN NOW.

Based on the AWA's that spotlight employee's got dumped with, which took
away all their conditions but gave them a 2 cent pay rise, THIS BEING A
LIBERAL SUPPORTER WHO WILL HAVE NO QUALMS AND CERTAINLY WILL NOT BE PAYING
OUT ANYTHING TO BRING WORKERS BACK TO NORMAL.

AAND OF COURSE IF YOU HAD BEEN WORKING FOR SPOTLIGHT YOU WOULD BE THE GEM ,
THE STANDOUT THAT THEY WANTED AT A HIGHER WAGE haha.

SO YOU'VE MOVED BACK TO THE PREWAR CONDITIONS SO NEXT DONT BE SURPRISED IF
AND IF YOU STOPPED SUCKING AND EXAMINED EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE WORTH WITH AN
EXPERT YOU COULD END UP RUEING THE MERE $40 AND EATING YOUR LUNCH IN 5MINS
WHEN YOU REACH RETIREMENT AGE AND HE GOES BACK TO GIVING YOU THE GOLD WATCH
AND HIS SINCERE THANKS.

AND GUYS IN THAT ERA HAD TO RESORT TO TIN CUPS AND SELLING PENCILS FOR THEIR
RETIREMENT TO BOLSTER THE PENSION, WHICH OF COURSE WITH THE LIBERALS IN
AGAIN, IT WILL BE A PENSION YOU WONT HAVE..

SURE THE WHLE PLACE WILL FALL OVER IF YOU LEAVE, AND YOUR BOSS COULD NOT
FIND SOMEONE TO FILL YOUR JOB. TAKE A LOOK AROUND YOU MATE, YOUR REPLAEMENT
COULD BE STEPPING OF A PLANE RIGHT NOW AS WE SPEAK.

WHAT ARE YOU, A BRAIN SURGEON??N OR THE CEO???

BY THE WAY THAT IS THE NEXT THE LIBERALS LOOK ;LIKE REMOVING, THE PENSION,
SO YOU HAD BETTER PRACTISE YOUR PENCIL PEDDLING OUT OF A TIN CUP.







OTHERTWISE YOU BETTER WAKE THAT NOBODY IS INDISPENSABLE , EVEN BRAIN
SURGEAONS ARE DISPENSABLE.

YOU HAVE TO BE AN IDIOT TO THINK THAT ALL THE GUYS WHO HAVE BEEN SCREWED AND
ARE BRAVE ENOUGH TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT JUST ARENT AS SMART AND AS GOOD AS
YOU???
GovShill
2007-05-28 23:05:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Princeandy
Post by GovShill
Post by Princeandy
WHAT CRAP, FOR THE SAME REASONS THAT UNIONS WERE ORIGINALLY FORMED, IT
COSTS
Post by GovShill
Post by Princeandy
THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS AND DAMN GOOD LAWTERS FOR ANY WORKER TO OBTAIN A
FAIR
Post by GovShill
Post by Princeandy
RATE SET ON PERSONAL SKILLS.
Crap. My contract was negotiated by ME.
Post by Princeandy
AND SKILLS AND LABOR DONT COUNT FOR MUCH IF YOU DONT HAVE THE BARGAINING
POWER OR LEGAL KNOWHOW TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOUR WORTH.
Bullshit! My boss needs my skills. He can't get them anywhere else. He
pays what I want. He increases it when appropriate to keep me working
for him, because it would cost too much too replace me.
Post by Princeandy
FOR EXAMPLE WHAT RATE WOULD YOU CONSIDER FAIR FOR AN ABLE WORKER?
Well, I'm on almost twice as much money/annum on the contract I signed
2 years ago than the unionised job I had before that. And I can work
the hours that I want, take leave when I want, get recompensed for
working hours in excess of the 38 agreed hours/week. Pretty happy with
it actually. Unfair dismissal doesn't come into the equation. I do a
fair days work and get paid a fair days wages.
WHAT ARE YOU, A BRAIN SURGEON??N OR THE CEO???
Oh dear. All CAPS. You feel you need to SHOUT to get your points
across? Can't be too good an argument.
Post by Princeandy
YOU SOUND LIKE THE PERFECT SUCKER KNOWITALL THAT WONT FIND OUT HOW THICK YOU
ARE TILL YOU'RE OLD ENOUGH TO WISH YOU'D HAD A BRAIN NOW.
I'm not young enough to think I know everything. You, on the other
hand, certainly appear to be.
Post by Princeandy
Based on the AWA's that spotlight employee's got dumped with, which took
away all their conditions but gave them a 2 cent pay rise, THIS BEING A
LIBERAL SUPPORTER WHO WILL HAVE NO QUALMS AND CERTAINLY WILL NOT BE PAYING
OUT ANYTHING TO BRING WORKERS BACK TO NORMAL.
This being a Liberal supporter who will have no qualms and certainly
will not be paying out anything to bring workers back to normal? There
are English words in the sentence, but no matter how many times I read
it it makes no sense.
Post by Princeandy
AAND OF COURSE IF YOU HAD BEEN WORKING FOR SPOTLIGHT YOU WOULD BE THE GEM ,
THE STANDOUT THAT THEY WANTED AT A HIGHER WAGE haha.
Had I worked for Spotlight and I didn't like the AWA I would not have
signed it. I would have walked out. I've done it before and will
probably do it again. I would not work for an employer who I didn't
like and who didn't appreciate the work I do.
Post by Princeandy
SO YOU'VE MOVED BACK TO THE PREWAR CONDITIONS SO NEXT DONT BE SURPRISED IF
AND IF YOU STOPPED SUCKING AND EXAMINED EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE WORTH WITH AN
EXPERT YOU COULD END UP RUEING THE MERE $40 AND EATING YOUR LUNCH IN 5MINS
Lunch in 5 minutes? You have no idea do you? I must work 38 hours/
week. Within reason I can work these anytime I like. I can start at
10am and work till 7pm, or start at 7am and work till 3pm. I can take
a 2 hour lunch break or a half hour one. So long as I do 38 hours for
the week my boss is happy.

See. This is what happens if you believe the unions and their
propaganda.
Post by Princeandy
WHEN YOU REACH RETIREMENT AGE AND HE GOES BACK TO GIVING YOU THE GOLD WATCH
AND HIS SINCERE THANKS.
AND GUYS IN THAT ERA HAD TO RESORT TO TIN CUPS AND SELLING PENCILS FOR THEIR
RETIREMENT TO BOLSTER THE PENSION, WHICH OF COURSE WITH THE LIBERALS IN
AGAIN, IT WILL BE A PENSION YOU WONT HAVE..
Never heard of superannuation? My boss pays that too. Part of the AWA.
Post by Princeandy
SURE THE WHLE PLACE WILL FALL OVER IF YOU LEAVE, AND YOUR BOSS COULD NOT
FIND SOMEONE TO FILL YOUR JOB. TAKE A LOOK AROUND YOU MATE, YOUR REPLAEMENT
COULD BE STEPPING OF A PLANE RIGHT NOW AS WE SPEAK.
Could be. Why would my boss replace me with someone else when we agree
on rates of pay, work hours, overtime, work output. Is this
hypothetical guy on the plane going to work for less? Is the skills
shortage we keep hearing about Liberal propaganda?
Post by Princeandy
WHAT ARE YOU, A BRAIN SURGEON??N OR THE CEO???
BY THE WAY THAT IS THE NEXT THE LIBERALS LOOK ;LIKE REMOVING, THE PENSION,
SO YOU HAD BETTER PRACTISE YOUR PENCIL PEDDLING OUT OF A TIN CUP.
OTHERTWISE YOU BETTER WAKE THAT NOBODY IS INDISPENSABLE , EVEN BRAIN
SURGEAONS ARE DISPENSABLE.
YOU HAVE TO BE AN IDIOT TO THINK THAT ALL THE GUYS WHO HAVE BEEN SCREWED AND
ARE BRAVE ENOUGH TO SAY SOMETHING ABOUT JUST ARENT AS SMART AND AS GOOD AS
YOU???-
Well, who can argue with such reasoned, well thought out and
articulated points as those? No wonder you need a union to negotiate
for you. Your communication skills are... pathetic

Shill #312
Loading...